All I could think the entire time I read was "Who cares?" Starr's writing was purely a flowery informative droll. Not only should he pride himself on his monotony but also in his ability to reach the same exact point despite asking different questions. The whole essay was repetitive and didn't have any examples or exciting places to hold the readers attention. It was an essay that left the reader saying "oh. that's nice."
I didn't really enjoy the essay either. I think it was a little too informative, but I believe that is how the author wanted it to be. By accomplishing his own goal, he did fulfill his purpose I suppose.
ReplyDelete